In the name of travel — SIGMA Sigma 17-50/2.8 EX DC OS HSM lens unpacking

First, all kinds of broken ideas

I like to travel, so I am confident that I have acquired a variety of related things for tourism.

The camera is very early to buy, but then again, it is basically a time when traveling and when it is out of the box. It is usually lying in a bag, and you don’t know when it started. You don’t know what to wear. Don't ask what it means to be boring. I don't care if it's boring anyway.

The SIGMA 18-35mm F1.8 DC HSM in this case has a superb appearance, and the 1.8-inch constant aperture is really attractive. However, I think that sooner or later I will go into the pit and the whole picture will not work. Can only be abandoned.

Later on, the original 18-35 new silver broadened, bright appearance, a variety of praise, after the upgrade body can also be used, but I do not know what reason always feel this head should be my upgrade body After reentry. So inexplicably abandoned.

Well, the excuses are in front of me.

Finally into the goods, see all kinds of reviews are pretty good, decisively

Second, the lens introduction

The camera arrived more than a month ago. Sigma's workmanship was generally satisfactory. The focal length of 17-50 covers 90% of my usual shooting time. I feel that if I go out for travel, this head is sufficient to use. The only thing that made me queasy was that this product was really heavy, and sometimes I changed to 50 1.8G and I felt like a toy.

Specific I still post a official website card, it will not be a screenshot

Third, the details show

The black mirror body and a circle of golden logo rings, ah, the appearance looks really pretty.

The anti-shake switch and AF/MF switch are crispy and the force required for triggering is just right.

The LOCK zoom lock switch is well-received, and it can reduce the possibility that the lens accidentally sticks out of the lens when it is transported or carried. However, saying that Sigma lens damping when compared to the original Nikon factory is slightly heavier, I actually feel that the original lens zoom moderate damping. So even if it is not locked, the lens will not automatically come out. At least for a month, I have never used this function and I haven't felt anything missing. This is awkward. It was originally a very thoughtful design.

The lens cap has a pinch-in design. For a while ago, Canon had used a friend for a while. Its lens cover was pinched on the edge. After the hood was attached, it was almost ready to be taken down. It seems that there are in the middle of the edge, anyway, I'm not Canon, not specifically studied, stupid and indistinct. I’m wrong to call me

For Nikon, this is the first picture.

In the chrysanthemum section, the bayonet part also has a rubber ring, which has a certain moisture-proof and splash-proof function.

17-50 Identify Yourself

MDDE IN JAPAN

77mm big eyes, looks pretty sturdy, do not intend to go hood, Buddha bless you do not touch

Hood, neither flocked nor threaded, matte-like matte

After the hood is mounted

Compared with the size of 50 1.8G, the volume is significantly larger, thicker, and longer, and this is a good word. The visual inspection is a bit larger than the original kite, and there is no sense of violation with the body.

Four, sample

Forgiveness is really lazy, or look at this, it is basically the first shot.

V. Summary

Really dare to say that it is evaluation. I am an amateur amateur myself. I feel too boring about the professional data of the lens, and whether the equipment is handy or not. I think this is the most important thing. It should be what we are pursuing. After all, all those quantified data are ultimately displayed in the form of finished products. Of course, I do not mean that the equipment is not important. This is not an issue of either or both. I mean those specifics. To deduct a little bit of poor data, I feel good use of equipment in my own hands, and use my brains is the most important. (I'm so fresh and refined that there is no money to explain. Do you want to applause?)

-------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------

The following pure subjective:

The suitable focal length can satisfy most of the shooting tasks. If you need a cheap and adequate lens, take a trip to take a photo of this tour, I think this is really good

Although there is no telephoto, but the closest focus distance of this cargo is much better, 0.28M, but I found that if you manually twist, less than 0.1M distance can also focus, which is really more than my hands on the 18 105 The reason why the set of heads and the 501.8G are too much may be the reason why I haven't used a good head.

Damping can be lighter, really heavy

The weight of the lens itself is impressive, but it may feel uncomfortable for a long time and the weight of the head can be controlled.


the above! ! !